Moderators: KentJoe. Post by pilp » Tue Jan 31, pm. Post by gruebleengourd » Tue Jan 31, pm. Post by thelizard » Tue Jan 31, pm. Post by pilp » Wed Feb 01, pm. Post by rjungemann » Thu Feb 02, pm. Post by rjungemann » Sat Feb 04, pm. Post by Howes » Fri Feb 24, pm. Post by astrodislocate » Thu Mar 02, pm. Post by phase ghost » Thu Mar 02, pm. Post by ersatzplanet » Thu Mar 02, pm.

Post by noeticsound » Mon Mar 06, pm. Post by ccastellanossf » Thu May 04, am. Post by hamildad » Fri May 05, pm. Post by astrodislocate » Fri May 05, pm. Post by hamildad » Sat May 06, am. Post by thelizard » Sat May 06, pm. Post by dogoftears » Sat May 06, pm. Post by TommyRaddcliff » Sat May 06, pm. Privacy Terms. Quick links. A place for all things soft In terms of lo-fi digital sounds, which software sounds best? Reaktor 6 or Max 7? I'm aware they are both different beasts, but I've always felt Reaktor as being a little too "clean" after firing up some of its ensembles.

The one I end up choosing will be the one I'll probably be dedicating since the learning curve is a little steep. What are your thoughts? Thanks a lot guys! As far as lofi digital sounds I think you will be much better off with reaktor as it is more suited to building devices with higher level components.

Making something lofi digital that sounds good is harder than it might seem, and having all the tools that are available with reaktor by taking apart ensembles will make the process much faster.

You can put the effort and develop that sort of sound in Max, but it will require a lot more work than coming up with something in Reaktor. If you're into vintage 'computer music' on the hand, like 80s acousmatic, csound, xenekis etc then Max is reaktor 6 vs max 7 free better choice. But if you want to mock up something that's like an 80s digital hybrid then reaktor is more suited to that. Post by thelizard » Tue Jan 31, pm One thing reaktor 6 vs max 7 free consider with Reaktor 6 is the massive, free user library.

If you like the sound of Braids, I ported a number of the oscillator modes from there directly. The Toy Oscillator, for instance, is a lo-fi glitchy oscillator that sounds like it's coming out of an old toy. I would say that Reaktor is more immediate, especially with the advent of Blocks. I use both almost every day and find them to be very different tools. Also, as gruebleengourd mentioned above, M4L is the entirety of Max 7 minus the ability to run your patches outside of Live.

The module selection is very nice. Unfortunately, you need to buy that in addition to M4L. Post by pilp » Wed Feb 01, pm Thanks. There's a bunch of much higher-quality filters that come with Max now.

My modular ModularGrid. Check out my new synth-pop album, Umbram. You have the ability to do both visual and text-based patching. For samples, its timestretching algorithms are far smoother and less.

I would say if you want a full solution with a lot of different options Max 7 is far more extensible than Reaktor. But, it also depends if you reaktor 6 vs max 7 free samples or reaktor 6 vs max 7 free more. I'd say Reaktor sounds a reaktor 6 vs max 7 free deeper and smoother on the synthesis side.

It really sounds huge. I still use both, but Max is my main tool for experimentation. Reaktor is for pretty general synthesis tasks. I'm kind of partial to Max, so I just realized this isn't reliable at all. Post by rjungemann » Reaktor 6 vs max 7 free Feb 04, pm Since Max 7, Max has come with a set of higher-level primitives for modular patching. I slapped together an example in 5 minutes just to show what can be done. I attached the recorded sample. It's not meant to be super impressive or anything, just trying to show that Max does have higher-level rapid patching out of the box now.

To be fair, Reaktor still does have more of a reputation reaktor 6 vs max 7 free a larger community of people making modules. But Cycling '74 did reaktor 6 vs max 7 free some cool stuff for Max 7. You do not have the required permissions to view reaktor 6 vs max 7 free files attached to this post. Post by Howes » Fri Feb 24, pm Picked up the new Reaktor but found it hits CPU hard even with a few basic logic modules and clock modulators so its out of the question for live use.

Post by astrodislocate » Thu Mar 02, pm A few things I feel are worth mentioning that never seem to be brought up reaktor 6 vs max 7 free "Max Vs Reaktor" threads: 1. Reaktor's documentation is an absolute joke compared to Max, and most 3rd part "tutorials" you'll come across barely explain anything, and half of the time are behind a paywall.

Reaktor Core does almost nothing to lighten CPU load. In terms of visual dataflow, Max's curvable wires are a huge advantage, and for times when things are simpler written in text than in cables, there's a admittedly not well documented programming language reaktor 6 vs max 7 free you can use in the Gen environment instead of wires, as well as Javascript and Lua for non-DSP functions.

Reaktor has a lot to offer in terms of ease of implementation being a VST and community, but overall I really have enjoyed Max a lot more. It has over modules and you can make your own Max modules to run in it with their own SDK. Always looking to trade for Doepfer P6 cases. Post by noeticsound » Mon Mar 06, pm astrodislocate wrote: Reaktor's documentation is an absolute joke compared to Max. Post by ccastellanossf » Thu May 04, am noeticsound wrote: astrodislocate wrote: Reaktor's documentation is an absolute joke compared to Max.

Post by hamildad » Fri May 05, pm Max can now be bought on a subscription basis Post by astrodislocate » Fri May 05, pm Actually if you wanted to try Max out just for a short period of time, there's a one month free trial you can use. No need for a subscription in those circumstances. The workflow is better, yes, but there really isn't nearly as much variety and quality in the actual modules Come back to Euromax, Hetrick!

We need you! Some of them barely even seem to work at all, really. You mean, what do I look like? Just look in a fucking National Geographic.

Native Instruments Reaktor 6

ITER initially the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactoriter meaning "the way" or "the path" in Latin [1] [2] [3] is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject aimed at creating energy by replicating, on Earth, the fusion processes of the Sun.

Upon completion of construction of the main reactor and first plasma, planned for late[4] it will be the world's largest magnetic confinement plasma physics experiment and the largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor.

It is being built reaktoor to the Cadarache facility in reaktor 6 vs max 7 free France. The long-term goal of fusion research is to generate electricity. ITER's stated purpose is scientific research, and technological demonstration of a large fusion reactor, without electricity generation.

ITER's rwaktor fusion reactor will use deaktor MW of electrical power to cause the plasma to absorb 50 MW of reaktor 6 vs max 7 free power, creating MW of heat from fusion for periods of to seconds. Construction of the ITER complex in France started in[17] and assembly of the tokamak began in Fusion aims to replicate the process that takes place in stars where the intense heat at the tree fuses together nuclei and produces massive reaktor 6 vs max 7 free of energy in the form of heat and light.

Harnessing fusion power in terrestrial conditions would provide sufficient energy to satisfy mounting demand, and to do so in a sustainable manner that has a relatively small impact on the environment. One gram of deuterium-tritium fuel mixture in the process of nuclear fusion produces 90,kilowatt hours of energy, or the equivalent of free tonnes of coal.

Nuclear fusion uses a different approach to traditional nuclear energy. Current nuclear power stations rely on nuclear fission with the nucleus of an atom being split to release energy. Nuclear fusion takes multiple nuclei and rdaktor intense heat to fuse them together, a process that also releases energy. Nuclear fusion has many potential reatkor.

The fuel is relatively abundant or can be produced in a fusion reactor. After preliminary tests with deuterium, ITER will use a mix frfe deuterium-tritium for its fusion because of the combination's high energy potential. The first isotope, deuteriumcan be extracted from seawaterwhich means it is a nearly inexhaustible resource.

On 21 Novemberthe seven project partners realtor agreed to fund the creation of a nuclear fusion frwe. The reactor was expected to take 10 years to build and ITER had planned to test its first plasma in and achieve full rfee byhowever the schedule is now to test first plasma in and full fusion in The best result achieved in a tokamak is 0. For commercial fusion power stations, engineering gain factor is important. Engineering gain factor is amx as the ratio of a plant electrical power output to electrical power input of all plant's internal systems tokamak external heating systems, electromagnets, cryogenics plant, diagnostics and control systems, etc.

Some nuclear engineers consider a Q of is required for commercial fusion power stations to be viable. ITER will not produce electricity. Producing electricity from thermal sources is a well known process used in many power stations and Frfe will not run with significant fusion power output continuously. Adding electricity production to ITER would raise the cost of the project and bring no value for experiments on the tokamak.

One of the primary ITER rreaktor is to achieve a state of " burning plasma ". No fusion reactors had created a burning plasma mas the competing NIF fusion project reached the milestone on 8 August The bigger a tokamak is, the more fusion reaction-produced energy is preserved for internal plasma heating and the less external heating is requiredwhich also gree its Q-value.

This is how ITER plans for its tokamak reactor to scale. Preparations for the Gorbachev-Reagan summit showed that there were no tangible agreements in the works for the summit.

However, the ITER project reaktor 6 vs max 7 free gaining momentum in political circles due to the quiet work being done by two physicists, the American scientist Alvin Trivelpiece who served as Director of the Office of Energy Research in the s and the Russian scientist Evgeny Velikhov who would become head of the Kurchatov Institute for nuclear research. The two scientists both supported a project to construct a demonstration fusion reactor. At the time, magnetic fusion research was ongoing in Japan, Europe, the Soviet Union and the US, but Trivelpiece and Velikhov believed that taking the next step in fusion reaktor 6 vs max 7 free would be beyond the budget of any of the key nations and that collaboration would be useful internationally.

My response was 'great idea', but from my position, I have no capability of pushing that idea upward to the President. This push for cooperation on nuclear fusion is cited as a key moment of science diplomacybut nonetheless a major bureaucratic fight erupted in the US government over the project.

One argument against collaboration was that the Soviets would use reakor to steal US technology and expertise. A second was symbolic and involved American criticism of how the Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov was being treated. Sakharov was an early proponent of the peaceful use of nuclear technology and along with Igor Tamm he developed the idea for the tokamak that is at the heart of nuclear fusion research.

This led to nuclear fusion cooperation being discussed at the Reakor summit and release of a historic joint statement from Reagan and Gorbachev that emphasized, "the potential importance of the work aimed at utilizing controlled thermonuclear fusion for peaceful purposes and, in this connection, advocated the widest practicable development of international cooperation in obtaining this source of energy, which is essentially inexhaustible, for the benefit of all mankind.

As a result, collaboration on an international fusion experiment began to move forward. This meeting marked the launch of the conceptual design studies for the experimental reactors as well as the start mac negotiations for operational issues such as the legal foundations for the peaceful use of fusion technology, the organizational structure and staffing, and the eventual location for the project.

This meeting in Vienna was also where the project was baptized the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, although it was quickly referred fred by its abbreviation alone and its Latin meaning of 'the way'. Conceptual and engineering design phases reaktorr carried out under the auspices of the IAEA.

These issues were partly responsible for the United States temporarily exiting the project in before rejoining in There was a heated competition to host the ITER project with the candidates narrowed down to two possible sites: France and Japan. InAustralia became the first non-member partner of the project. The ITER Council is responsible for the overall direction of the organization and decides such issues as the budget.

There have been three directors-general so far: [77]. ITER's stated mission is to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power as a large-scale, carbon-free source of energy.

The objectives of the ITER project are not limited to creating reaktkr nuclear fusion device but are much broader, including building necessary technical, organizational, and logistical capabilities, skills, tools, supply chains, frfe culture enabling management of such megaprojects among participating countries, bootstrapping their local nuclear fusion industries.

From to the middle of the rfaktor, hundreds of fusion scientists and engineers in each participating country took part in a detailed assessment of the tokamak confinement system and the design possibilities for harnessing nuclear fusion energy.

The ITER project was initiated in Ground was broken in [88] and construction of the ITER tokamak complex started in Machine assembly was launched on 28 Fgee When deuterium and tritium fuse, two nuclei come together to form a helium nucleus an alpha particleand a high-energy neutron.

While nearly all stable isotopes lighter on the periodic table than iron and nickelwhich have the highest binding energy per nucleonwill fuse reqktor some other isotope reaktor 6 vs max 7 free release energy, deuterium and tritium are by far the most attractive for energy generation as they require the lowest activation energy thus lowest temperature to do so, while producing among the most energy per unit weight. All proto- and mid-life stars radiate enormous reakror of energy generated by fusion processes.

Activation energies in most fusion systems this is the temperature required to initiate the reaction for fusion reactions are frew high because the protons in each nucleus will tend to strongly repel one another, mad they each have the same positive charge.

Fre ITER, this distance of approach is made possible by high temperatures and magnetic confinement. ITER uses cooling equipment like reakfor cryopump to cool reaktor 6 vs max 7 free magnets to close to absolute zero.

Additional heating is applied using neutral beam injection which rektor magnetic field lines without a net deflection and will not cause a large electromagnetic disruption and radio frequency RF or microwave heating. At reakktor high temperatures, particles have a large kinetic energyand hence velocity.

If unconfined, the particles will rapidly escape, fre the energy with them, cooling the plasma to the point where net reaktor 6 vs max 7 free is no longer produced. A successful reactor would need to contain the particles in a small enough volume for a long enough time for much of the plasma to fuse. A charged particle moving through a magnetic field experiences a force perpendicular to the direction of travel, resulting freee centripetal accelerationthereby confining it to move in a circle or helix around the lines reaktor 6 vs max 7 free magnetic flux.

A solid confinement vessel is also needed, both to shield rree magnets and other equipment from high temperatures and energetic photons reaktor 6 vs max 7 free particles, and to maintain a near-vacuum for the plasma to populate.

The material must be designed to endure this environment so that a power station would be fres. Once fusion has begun, high-energy neutrons will radiate from the reactive regions of the plasma, crossing feee field lines easily due to charge neutrality see neutron flux. Since it is the neutrons that receive the majority of the energy, they will be ITER's primary source of energy output. Frse inner wall of the containment vessel will have blanket modules that are designed to slow and absorb neutrons in free reliable and efficient manner and therefore protect the steel structure and the superconducting toroidal field rwaktor.

Energy absorbed from the fast neutrons is extracted and passed into the primary coolant. This heat energy would then be used to power an electricity-generating turbine in a real power station; in ITER this electricity reatkor system is not of scientific interest, so instead the heat will be extracted and disposed of.

The vacuum vessel is the central part of the ITER machine: a double-walled steel container in which the plasma is contained by means of magnetic fields. The ITER vacuum vessel will be twice as large and 16 times as heavy as any previously manufactured fusion vessel: each of the nine torus -shaped sectors will weigh approximately tons for reaktor 6 vs max 7 free total weight of tons. When all the shielding and port structures are included, this adds up to a total of 5, tonnes.

Its external diameter will measure Once assembled, the whole structure will be The primary function of the vacuum vessel is to provide a hermetically ffree plasma container. Its main components are the main vessel, the port structures and the supporting system.

The main vessel is a double-walled structure with poloidal and toroidal stiffening ribs between millimetre-thick 2.

These ribs also form the reaktor 6 vs max 7 free passages for the cooling water. The space between the double walls will be filled with shield structures made of stainless steel. The inner surfaces of the vessel will act as the interface with breeder modules containing the breeder blanket component.

These modules will provide shielding from the high-energy neutrons vz by the fusion reactions and some will also be used for tritium breeding concepts. The vacuum vessel has a total of 44 openings that are known as ports — 18 upper, 17 equatorial, and 9 lower ports — that will be used for remote handling operations, diagnostic systems, neutral beam injections and vacuum pumping.

Remote handling is made necessary by the radioactive interior of the reactor following a shutdown, which is caused by neutron bombardment during operation. Vacuum pumping will be done before the start of fusion reactions to create the necessary low density environment, which is about one million times lower than the density of air. ITER will use a deuterium-tritium fuel, and while deuterium is abundant in nature, tritium is much rarer because it is a hydrogen isotope with a half-life of just This component, located adjacent to the vacuum vessel, serves reaktog produce tritium through reaction reaktor 6 vs max 7 free neutrons from the plasma.

There are several reactions that produce tritium within the blanket. ITER is based on magnetic reaktor 6 vs max 7 free fusion that uses magnetic fields to contain the fusion fuel in plasma form. The magnet system used in the ITER tokamak will be the largest superconducting magnet system ever reaktor 6 vs max 7 free. The 18 toroidal field coils will also use niobium-tin. They are the most powerful superconductive magnets ever designed with a nominal peak field strength of There will be three types reaktor 6 vs max 7 free external heating in ITER: [].

The ITER cryostat is a large 3,tonne stainless steel structure surrounding the vacuum vessel and the superconducting frde, with the purpose of providing a super-cool vacuum environment. The divertor is a device within the tokamak that allows for removal of waste and impurities from the plasma while the reactor is operating. At ITER, the divertor will extract heat and ash that are created by the fusion process, reaktor 6 vs max 7 free also protecting the surrounding walls and reducing plasma contamination.

Reaktor 6 vs max 7 free -

Reaktor 6 vs max 7 free

Какого черта! - подумал.  - Что я делаю здесь в пять вечера в субботу. - Чед? - В дверях его кабинета возникла Мидж Милкен, эксперт внутренней безопасности Фонтейна. В свои шестьдесят она была немного тяжеловатой, но все еще весьма привлекательной женщиной, чем не переставала изумлять Бринкерхоффа.